ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of autologous skin-grafting surgery ( ASGS) in the prevention of esophageal stenosis after complete circular endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection ( ESTD) for early esophageal cancer. Methods Between January 2018 and March 2018, five patients with early esophageal cancer underwent complete circular ESTD and ASGS in Chinese PLA General Hospital. The skin-graft survival situation, and occurrence of esophageal stenosis and complications were observed by endoscopy follow-up. Results Complete circular ESTD and ASGS were successfully performed in all 5 patients, and no complications including perforation, bleeding, wound infection or stent migration occurred. The mean skin-graft survival rate was 86. 0％. Four patients did not experience esophageal stenosis over the mean follow-up of 9. 5 months. One patient experienced esophageal stenosis after operation, and underwent endoscopic balloon dilatation. No stenosis occurred in 8 months of follow-up. Conclusion ASGS is a safe and effective method to prevent esophageal stenosis after complete circular ESTD.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection ( ESTD) for treatment of large gastric angle superficial neoplasms. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on data of 87 patients with superfical neoplasms in gastric angle, including 32 cases undergoing ESTD and 55 cases undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection ( ESD) in 6 institutions between July 2014 and July 2016. The dissection time, dissection speed, en bloc resection rate, curative resection rate, adverse events, and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results The ESTD group showed a shorter dissection time ( 87. 3 ± 32. 6 min VS 136. 7 ± 64. 5 min, P<0. 01 ) , a higher dissection speed ( 0. 18 ± 0. 07 cm2/min VS 0. 08±0. 05 cm2/min, P<0. 01), a higher en bloc resection rate[100％ (32/32) VS 87. 3％ (48/55), P=0. 035], and a higher curative resection rate[100％ (32/32) VS 85. 5％ (47/55), P=0. 024] compared with the ESD group. The intraoperative bleeding rate[59. 4％ (19/32) VS 100. 0％( 55/55) , P<0. 01] and muscular injury rate[ 0 ( 0/32) VS 14. 5％ ( 8/55) , P=0. 024] were lower in the ESTD group than those of the ESD group. There was no statistical difference on recurrence rate between the two groups[0 (0/32) VS 1. 9％ (1/54), P=0. 443]. Conclusion ESTD has a higher dissection speed and greater security on treatment of large gastric angle superficial neoplasms, and is worthy to be generalized.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs). Methods A meta-analysis was performed on 18 related studies of ESTD on the treatment of esophageal SMTs retrieving from Chinese and English databases. Complete resection rate and en bloc resection rate were extracted for efficacy, and the complication rate, recurrence rate and death were used to evaluate safety. Results Complete resection rate was reported in all studies, and the pooled complete resection rate was 97. 5%(95%CI: 95. 4%-98. 6%). There were 9 studies that reported en bloc resection rate, and the pooled en bloc resection rate was 95. 9%(95%CI:90. 1%-98. 3%). Subcutaneous emphysema, mediastinal emphysema, pneumothorax, pneumoper-itoneum and perforation were reported in all 18 studies. The pooled prevalence of air leakage symptoms was 11. 3%(95%CI: 7. 0%-17. 6%) for subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum, 3. 6%( 95%CI:2. 1%-6. 2%) for pneumothorax and 3. 2%( 95%CI: 1. 9%-5. 4%) for pneumoperitoneum. Additionally, the pooled prevalence of perforation was 4. 9%(95%CI: 3. 1%-7. 8%).Intraoperative bleeding was reported in 2 studies, and the pooled incidence of bleeding was 3. 7%(95%CI: 2. 1%-6. 4%). During the follow-up of the 18 studies, no death was reported, and only 2 cases of recurrence were reported in one study. Conclusion ESTD is safe and effective for esophageal SMTs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In recent years, endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) has gained popularity worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESTD in treating upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) in a large-volume endoscopic center. METHODS: Patients with SMTs were enrolled in this study between January 2012 and January 2015. Demographic data, clinical data, and treatment outcome were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy SMTs originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer were identified in 69 patients. All patients successfully underwent the ESTD procedure. The mean procedure time was 49.0±29.5 minutes, and the mean tumor size was 18.7±7.2 mm. Among all lesions, the majority (70.0%) were located in the esophagus, 12.9% in the cardia, and 17.1% in the stomach. Complete resection was achieved in 67 lesions (95.7%). Perforation occurred in three patients (4.3%), who were treated by endoclips. Pneumothorax occurred in two patients (2.9%) and was successfully managed by thoracic drainage. During a median follow-up of 18.1 months, patients were free of local recurrence or distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the feasibility and safety of ESTD in treating upper gastrointestinal SMTs originating from the MP layer. Large-scale comparative studies with other treatment methods should be conducted in the future.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cardia , Drainage , Esophagus , Follow-Up Studies , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pneumothorax , Recurrence , Stomach , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the effect of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection on patients with large esophageal superficial neoplasms.Methods: Chosen patients with large esophageal superficial neoplasms in our hospital as research object, randomly divided into control group treated by endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) and observation group treated by endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection(ESTD), compared surgery related indicators, complications and treatment outcomes.Results: 1)Observation group patients’ tumor stripping rate (23.17±4.73)/min was significantly higher than control group patients’ (12.65±2.19)/min; Intraoperative blood loss(9.14±0.67)ml, total length of hospital stay (7.34±1.89) d, were significantly less than control group patients with intraoperative blood loss(21.38±3.14)ml, total length of hospital stay (13.21±3.05)d, t value was 4.965, 5.395, 4.932, respectively(t=4.965,t=5.395,t=4.932;P<0.05); 2)Observation group patients esophageal bleeding ESTD rate(5.26%), esophageal stricture rate(31.58%), mediastinal emphysema rate(5.26%), esophageal perforation rate of 0, were significantly less than control group patients with esophageal bleeding rate(31.58%), esophageal stricture rate(5.26%), mediastinal emphysema rate(21.05%), esophageal perforation rate (26.32%), t value were 4.378, 4.378, 4.471, 5.758, (t=4.378,t=4.378,t=4.471,t=5.758;P<0.05); 3)Observation group patients with no recurrence during the follow-up period, control group patients with local recurrence rate of 21.05%, t value 8.623,P<0.05(t=8.623, P<0.05).Conclusion: Endoscopic tunnel mucosal stripping technique can effectively improve the complete tumor removal rate, during the process of optimization operation at the same time reduce the occurrence of complications, to the improvement of the prognosis of patients with positive clinical significance.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of preoperative mark with methylene blue for the submucosal tumor originating from the muscluaris propria around the cardia in submucosal tunnel.Meth-ods A total of 27 patients with cardiac tumors originating from muscularis propria diagnosed by endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography underwent endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection from June 2011 to May 2014.Eighteen cases were marked by methylene blue,and 9 others were not.The operation time and the in-cidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results All lesions were resected success-fully.The time of lesion location of non-mark group was 14.7 minutes(9-32 min),and that of mark group was 8.1 minutes(7-10 min).The incidence of subcutaneous emphysema of thorax and cervix of non-mark group was 2 /9(2 cases),and that of the mark group was 1 /18(1 case).The incidence of pneumoperitone-um of non-mark group was 1 /9(1 case),while that of the mark group was 2 /18(2 cases).There was no pneumothorax or mediastinal emphesema in all cases.Conclusion Marking with methylene blue before op-eration can shorten operation time effectively and lower incidence of complications.